Genus Formica Linné

      Formica xerophila M. Smith
Formica moki
Wheeler 1913b:558-560; o (in part).


     Formica (Neoformica) moki
subsp. xerophila M. Smith 1939b:581-584; o. Creighton 1950:550; o.
     Formica moki
subsp. grundmanni Cole 1943:184; o.
     Formica xerophila:
Francoeur 1973:259-263; figs. 455-458; o. Allred 1982:478. Wheeler and Wheeler 1986:92.

     RANGE: Southeastern Washington to Southern California; Utah; Northwestern Arizona.
     DESERT RECORDS. Map 21. Inyo Co.: 7 mi W. Lone Pine, 5800',
21 June 1965 (GJW, #Cal.14; GJW). Los Angeles Co.: 2 mi S Little Rock, -------------------------------------------.
     DISCUSSION. The Inyo County record is somewhat outside our project area but we have included it on the assumption that F. xerophila may ultimately be found at other sites in Inyo County that do lie within the confines of this study. Other ants found in the Lone Pine vicinity do reach our area. This species is most similar to F. gnava among our species. A little practice is necessary to recognize the difference in the propodeal shape, but since the two species are widely separated geographically no problems should arise in distinguishing between them.
     Our only record is from Sagebrush Scrub and it probably will befound in similar habitats within the BLM area.

Next


• • •
Date of this version 10, Nov. 2003
• • •
All text and images contained on this web site are copyright © 2000 - 2003